Health Care AI and Patient Privacy-Dinerstein v Google.

This Viewpoint summarizes a recent lawsuit alleging that a hospital violated patients' privacy by sharing electronic health record (EHR) data with Google for development of medical artificial intelligence (AI) and discusses how the federal court's decision in the case provides key insights for hospitals planning to share EHR data with for-profit companies developing medical AI.

President Biden's Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence-Implications for Health Care Organizations.

This Viewpoint discusses a recent executive order by US President Joe Biden about the development and implementation of AI, including the role of government vs the private sector and how the order may affect health care.

Proceso de implementación de una iniciativa de atención a mujeres en postaborto en Chile, 2016-2020 / The implementation process of a post-abortion healthcare initiative in Chile, 2016-2020

Objetivo: Analizar el proceso de implementación de una iniciativa de calidad de atención en el postaborto en tres hospitales de Santiago de Chile para su posterior escalamiento al ámbito nacional. Método: Se efectuó un estudio cualitativo, con base en una revisión documental sustentada en documentos normativos emitidos por el Ministerio de Salud y 23 entrevistas semiestructuradas a tomadores de decisiones, profesionales de salud y usuarias. Se realizó un análisis de contenido usando el programa Atlas-ti 8. Resultados: A nivel normativo, se identificaron acciones relacionadas con la implementación de la iniciativa, y a nivel de proceso se identificaron los aciertos, las dificultades y las resistencias que experimentaron los equipos involucrados en el piloto durante su implementación. A pesar de que la implementación de la iniciativa no fue planificada, tuvo efectos positivos para el bienestar de las mujeres y el desempeño de los profesionales de atención implicados en el proceso. Conclusiones: Esta experiencia es un punto de partida para planear la implementación nacional con base en estrategias bien definidas. Los resultados aportan una experiencia documentada para quienes desean desarrollar iniciativas o programas de atención a mujeres en situación de postaborto.

Objective: To analyze the implementation process of a quality post-abortion care initiative in three hospitals in Santiago de Chile for its subsequent scale up at the national level. Method: A qualitative study was carried out, based on a documentary review supported by governmental normative documents issued by the Ministry of Health and 23 semi-structured interviews with decision-makers, health providers and users. Content analysis was performed using the Atlas-ti 8 software. Results: At the regulatory level, actions related to the implementation of the initiative were identified, and at the process level, the success, difficulties and resistance experienced by the teams involved in the pilot during its implementation were identified. Although the implementation of the initiative was not planned, it had positive effects on the well-being of the women and the performance of the care providers involved in the process. Conclusions: This experience is a starting point to plan implementation at the national level with well-defined strategies. Our results provide a documented experience for those who wish to develop post-abortion care initiatives or programs.

The Supreme Court's 303 Creative Decision and the Threat to LGBTQ+ Health Care.

This Viewpoint examines the importance of the Supreme Court decision in 303 Creative and its possible effects on legislation safeguarding nondiscriminatory health care.

The End of the X-waiver: Excitement, Apprehension, and Opportunity.

With the passage of the MAT act (Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment) and the MATE Act (Medication Training and Expansion), the Drug Enforcement Agency "X-waiver" program governing the office-based prescription of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder has been immediately eliminated. The move was championed by vocal organizations with a rightful concern about buprenorphine access but was opposed by most physicians. Nonetheless, buprenorphine can now be prescribed like any schedule 3 medication. Studies show that despite rising opioid overdoses, buprenorphine prescription increases have been slow to rise and are particularly absent in rural communities. The elimination of the X-waiver may theoretically improve buprenorphine prescribing rates for opioid use disorder in rural areas, by nurse practitioners and physician assistants, and by resident physicians in teaching programs. It may also help decrease discrimination against individuals with opioid use disorder in postacute-care settings like nursing homes, physical rehabilitation centers, and in prisons and jails. Concerns include the elimination of the only focused opioid use disorder education many physicians receive (X-waiver courses) and a literature base showing that interest, rather than the X-waiver itself, remains the biggest barrier to recruiting more buprenorphine prescribers. Concerns also exist over the harms of precipitated withdrawal when buprenorphine is initiated inappropriately. The change of the elimination of the X-waiver brings about a new opportunity for Family Medicine and its parent organizations to champion the inclusion of opioid use disorder treatment within the chronic disease care models well-known to our integrated care settings.

Affirmative Action Ruled Unconstitutional: Options for Building a Diverse Health Care Workforce.

This Viewpoint reviews how the recent US Supreme Court decision regarding affirmative action affects extant medical school admission policies seeking to enhance diversity of the national medical student body and its derivative national health care workforce.

Providing Responsible Health Care for Out-of-State Patients.

This Viewpoint discusses why the legality of calling patients located in another state has suddenly been called into question.

How the SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Could Affect Medical Schools and Health Care.

This Medical News feature examines the potential impact of the US Supreme Court's affirmative action decision on medical schools and health care.

Generative AI in Health Care and Liability Risks for Physicians and Safety Concerns for Patients.

This Viewpoint discusses the potential use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in medical care and the liability risks for physicians using the technology, as well as offers suggestions for safeguards to protect patients.

As Laws Restricting Health Care Surge, Some US Physicians Choose Between Fight or Flight.

In this Medical News article, 13 physicians and health care experts spoke with JAMA about the increasing efforts to criminalize evidence-based medical care in the US.

A Policy Framework for the Growing Influence of Private Equity in Health Care Delivery.

This Viewpoint details how and why improved oversight of private equity acquisition of physician practices and hospitals is needed to mitigate the effects on health care costs, clinicians' jobs, and patients' access to care.

Clinical Algorithms, Antidiscrimination Laws, and Medical Device Regulation.

This Viewpoint discusses recent legal directives by the DHHS and FDA that could increase health care entities' liability for possible discriminatory biases of clinical algorithms and the need for additional legal clarity to avoid adverse effects on algorithm development and use.

Thurgood Marshall, Hero of American Medicine.

One of the heroes in American history, Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall (1908-1993) sought legal remedies against racial discrimination in education and health care. As director of the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) of NAACP from 1940 to 1961, his success in integrating law schools in Texas led to the first black medical student admitted to a state medical school in the South. Representing doctors and dentists needing a facility to perform surgery, the LDF brought cases before the courts in North Carolina that moved the country toward justice in health care. His ultimate legal victory came in 1954, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the decision that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. In 1964, the LDF under Jack Greenberg, Marshall's successor as director, won Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, a decision that held that hospitals accepting federal funds had to admit black patients. The two decisions laid the judicial foundation for the laws and administrative acts that changed America's racial history, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Social Security Act Amendments of 1965 that established Medicare and Medicaid. His achievements came during the hottest period of the American civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s. Well past the middle of the twentieth century, black Americans were denied access to the full resources of American medicine, locked in a "separate-but-equal" system woefully inadequate in every respect. In abolishing segregation, Marshall initiated the long overdue remedy of the unjust legacies of slavery and Jim Crow.